dolphinjet said:
There are millions of descriptive tags out there. I'd rather not to spend too much time. For those soft descriptive tags, while useful for others I rarely add them unless that particular feature is interesting to me. There are too many to add. As the time to research for the source was already spent, I can't afford to play with the million of tags further more.
How you think the tagging feature should be used isn't how we actually use it. I've let others chime in on the topic so as to give you a full breadth of other thoughts and opinions to take heed of, but if you're going to be ignorant to it then let me remark a few things.
I think did my job already and wasted a few minutes of my life. It's unfair to assume I did nothing and give me a negative response.
Forgive me for saying this so crudely, but you ain't done shit. If you think your job is to "just find good ups" from whatever random image in whatever board you browse then I'd rather you quit the job and do something else that you think is more productive with your time. Uploading is a volunteer effort by every contributor here that mandates tagging by the original uploader to make those images easier to find. If that weren't so, then we'd be so backlogged on images it'd be impossible to find art with a certain set of features one searches for in particular.
Currently I believe the negative I issued you is deserved, but I'm welcome to remove it if and only if you make an active effort to tag so as to mandate removal of it. You are not a regular uploader -- that may not change. But what I do hope to see is either you stop altogether, or you improve. Doing it halfheartedly is grounds for a temporary ban.