create implication opaque_glasses -> glasses
EDIT: The tag implication opaque_glasses -> glasses has been rejected by @Type-kun.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Posted under Tags
create implication opaque_glasses -> glasses
EDIT: The tag implication opaque_glasses -> glasses has been rejected by @Type-kun.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Glasses and sunglasses are separate, as has been confirmed in topic #12939, and a lot of the opaque_glasses -glasses images are of sunglasses. A couple of the others are for goggles.
Should a similar solution to that used in that thread be adopted by instead aliasing opaque glasses to a new opaque eyewear tag?