create implication head_on_head -> heads_together

BUR #7164 has been rejected.

create implication head_on_head -> heads_together

I missed this one back in forum #189868

I don't know about this. heads_together head_on_head only has two results. If I think about "heads together" I think of post #4824145, not post #4815928.

nonamethanks said:

I don't know about this. heads_together head_on_head only has two results. If I think about "heads together" I think of post #4824145, not post #4815928.

Why's that. The heads are still touching in the second example and it's just as if not more intimate.
The tag's original name was heads touching too, so I don't see the problem.

BUR #7493 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias chin_on_head -> head_on_head

"Together" usually means some degree of mutuality. A chin resting on a head (turns out we also have chin on head, I guess we should merge these) is not "heads together", that's more for cheek-to-cheek or forehead-to-forehead where the same part of both heads is touching.

what about this? post #4829102

In my opinion, heads together should involve two or more interactive actions. So this post has definitely head on head, but not heads together.

The bulk update request #7493 (forum #198101) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #7164 (forum #196478) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.