Blank_User said:
The torsos. Those women look like they're over a dozen heads tall.
I mean, that's the main reason I stopped posting from this artist (and also wouldn't approve them unless they're not awfully bad).
Posted under General
Administration should clear up the rules on AI posts, it is not mentioned that AI posts are banned outright, only "Fully AI-generated art with no human input".
My pieces are always processed and manually edited. It should be made clear what "fully AI-generated" means.
If AI is indeed fully banned it should be mentioned more clearly.
The rules are pretty clear. Fully AI-generated art is banned as per the upload rules and the wiki, which your post is tagged as. AI-assisted art is not strictly against the rules but they're held at a higher degree of scrutiny, which is also in the rules. According to the deletion message you've already read the rules so this shouldn't be something that you missed.
See ai-assisted status:active for posts that have AI involvement but are not fully AI generated and are in fact approved on the site.
Greemann said:
Administration should clear up the rules on AI posts, it is not mentioned that AI posts are banned outright, only "Fully AI-generated art with no human input".
My pieces are always processed and manually edited. It should be made clear what "fully AI-generated" means.If AI is indeed fully banned it should be mentioned more clearly.
My bad, you tagged it both generated and assisted here and tagged it as AI on Pixiv. Your profiles claim only "AI art using Stable Diffusion" with no mention of any manual edits, so it looked like you knowingly uploaded rule-breaking content. I'll appeal the post so the other approvers can decide if they like it or not.
WeakestResUser said:
The rules are pretty clear. Fully AI-generated art is banned as per the upload rules and the wiki, which your post is tagged as. AI-assisted art is not strictly against the rules but they're held at a higher degree of scrutiny, which is also in the rules. According to the deletion message you've already read the rules so this shouldn't be something that you missed.
See ai-assisted status:active for posts that have AI involvement but are not fully AI generated and are in fact approved on the site.
I did read the rules but as I said it is never properly explained what "Fully AI-generated" means.
I added both tags because I was unsure which one I should select.
Nameless_Contributor said:
My bad, you tagged it both generated and assisted here and tagged it as AI on Pixiv. Your profiles claim only "AI art using Stable Diffusion" with no mention of any manual edits, so it looked like you knowingly uploaded rule-breaking content. I'll appeal the post so the other approvers can decide if they like it or not.
Okay thank you, I'm not trying to argue against the rules, if AI posts are banned then I'll post them elsewhere, it just seems unclear what qualifies as "Fully AI-generated".
The degree of human input varies depending on the pieces, but I usually add/remove numerous elements and draw details to make the stuff as good as possible.
Greemann said:
I did read the rules but as I said it is never properly explained what "Fully AI-generated" means.
I'm not sure what part you're confused about. The definition doesn't leave much to interpretation.
Fully AI-generated means it was created with nothing but prompts.
AI-assisted means the artist applied enough of their own artistic skill that they could legitimately take credit for it. If you're only making very minor changes to what was generated with prompts, then it doesn't count and should be tagged AI-generated instead.
Think of it this way: if you ran half a marathon and had a friend drive you the rest of the way, you still put in a lot of effort even if you didn't finish on your own. On the other hand, if you only ran five feet before getting a ride, can you really say you put in any effort?
If you're still not sure if your edits are enough for your posts to qualify for AI-assisted, you can try asking in the AI-generated art check thread (topic #22285).
This pixel art piece is pretty damn cute, why wasn't it approved?
post #7582340
Regular pixel art, no physical flaws
post #6785517
post #7560062
post #7557380
Very normal body
post #6258736
The same fetish as the artist’s other works
post #7583441
post #7565676
post #7566567
post #7566598 + post #7575224
post #7578753
post #7578786
post #7578834
post #7583437 + post #7583439 + post #7583441
post #7583488 + post #7583489 + post #7583493
post #7583503
Every. Single. One. Of these posts have been deleted and I am now down to 7 upload slots. I simply ask two questions: Why have these posts been deleted and is there any way to appeal them?
BSXT said:
Most have exaggeratedly big breasts and penises for me. At the bottom of the sidebar to the left/bottom of a post, under the "Options" section, you'll find an option to appeal posts. See howto:appeal for detailed information about it.
I would like reviews on why these wasn't approved so that I will not post works that does not fit the reviews in future.
Blank_User said:
I'm not sure what part you're confused about. The definition doesn't leave much to interpretation.
Fully AI-generated means it was created with nothing but prompts.
AI-assisted means the artist applied enough of their own artistic skill that they could legitimately take credit for it. If you're only making very minor changes to what was generated with prompts, then it doesn't count and should be tagged AI-generated instead.
Think of it this way: if you ran half a marathon and had a friend drive you the rest of the way, you still put in a lot of effort even if you didn't finish on your own. On the other hand, if you only ran five feet before getting a ride, can you really say you put in any effort?
If you're still not sure if your edits are enough for your posts to qualify for AI-assisted, you can try asking in the AI-generated art check thread (topic #22285).
That is much clearer than what is written in the rulebook.
I spend a lot of time editing the generated material.
Not sure what you mean by "this is clearer than what's written in the rules". Danbooru supports hyperlinking tags and both AI-generated and AI-assisted are hyperlinked in the rules specifically so you can click on them and see what counts as either. Although Blank User provided an analogy that makes it easier to understand, both the rules and tag wikis for both clearly explain how either is used.
From the rules:
The rules and wikis are clear about either. You have to actually read them.
EDIT: If it helps any, I've added some extra flavour text in the Upload Rules so it's more visible at first glance without needing to visit the tag wikis.
Updated
Would like review/feedback. I dedicated some time translating posts (faithfully based on in-game dialog) and was sad to see this deleted after I translated it.
Hello! These posts were not approved and have been deleted:
Could I ask for feedback as to why that was the case? I'd like to upload images correctly so they're not deleted in the future. Could these perhaps get a second chance?
Thank you in advance!
Good Day! I would appreciate some feedback on why post #7407972 was deleted? Thanks in advance!
I don’t understand why post #7588786 is approved while post #7588765, post #7588734 and post #7588826 are deleted. Maybe because the others don’t have pool tags?