Tag implication: cleave_gag -> gag

create implication cleave_gag -> gag

Link to implication

-1. The gag tag is supposed be for objects specifically designed to gag a person, which was decided in topic #4997 almost 3 years ago. A "cleave gag" ceases being a "gag" once you remove it from the mouth, thus it should not be tagged gag. If it must implicate something then the gagged tag would be the appropriate tag.

Going with that, I'd like to request the de-implication of pantygag -> gag and pantygag -> panties. (1) pantygag should not implicate gag due to the above, and (2) the tag in use is panty_gag not pantygag, so the implications have been applied to an unused tag.

If you want an improvised_gag tag it could work instead. Even if it is effectively gagged -gag.

Log said:

If you want an improvised_gag tag it could work instead. Even if it is effectively gagged -gag.

It's not "effectively" that is exactly what it is though.