Danbooru

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

Cappucciruno said:

Is there a tag for clothing such as post #3200072 ? Usually a dress shirt, slightly too long, sometimes panties are in view, with implications that it's someone else's.

Not one tag for something so specific, but there are combinations of tags that can be used for the same effect. Oversized_clothes shirt ~bottomless ~no_pants is a good place to start.

In the same line, is there a tag for oversized clothing under which a character may of may not have any bottoms or underwear? Example: post #3184783

See the usage notes for no_pants and bottomless. Also try pool #2385.

Updated by DanbooruBot

iridescent_slime said:

See the usage notes for no_pants and bottomless. Also try pool #2385.

Personally I think the "If the individual depicted is not wearing any lower-body clothing, but the upper-body clothing (typically a shirt) is still concealing the crotch without any indications as to whether they're still wearing underwear, then the image may be tagged bottomless in addition to no_pants." part under grey areas is stupid, those tags shouldn't be used together in solo images.

Updated by DanbooruBot

I'm not tagging a specific post but I noticed the lack of a tag for when someone puts their hand to their ear meaning "call me"
it's a pretty common pose so I find it odd there's no tag for it. I know shaka sign is a tag, but it's not commonly used and I don't think it's quite the same thing...

Updated by DanbooruBot

purikkuri said:

I'm not tagging a specific post but I noticed the lack of a tag for when someone puts their hand to their ear meaning "call me"
it's a pretty common pose so I find it odd there's no tag for it. I know shaka sign is a tag, but it's not commonly used and I don't think it's quite the same thing...

We have hand_phone with a whopping two posts.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Unbreakable said:

Personally I think the "If the individual depicted is not wearing any lower-body clothing, but the upper-body clothing (typically a shirt) is still concealing the crotch without any indications as to whether they're still wearing underwear, then the image may be tagged bottomless in addition to no_pants." part under grey areas is stupid, those tags shouldn't be used together in solo images.

I agree. I would prefer just no pants to be tagged in those situations.

Updated by DanbooruBot

From the looks of it the character is a personification of a teruterubouzu, meaning both "Teru-chan" and "Teruko" are just derivative nicknames, like calling a cat "kitty". Adding "-chan", "-tan", or "-ko" is typical with personifications, which explains the random comment. Honorifics ordinarily aren't considered part of one's name, but in this case it would be appropriate since the character doesn't really have a name in the first place. If the artist consistently calls her "Teru-chan", then that's fine as long as you add a qualifier for the artist, otherwise you could just tag each one personification + teruterubouzu and leave it at that.

Updated by DanbooruBot

c933103 said:

What's the tag for Enjo Kousai?

If you see characters on a "date" discussing payment, or money changing hands, then it should probably just be tagged prostitution.

Otherwise, without any apparent indication that one character is paying the other, I don't see how you're supposed to distinguish this activity from ordinary interactions between couples. Maybe they're just on a regular date? Anything beyond that is a matter of individual interpretation.

If you can provide examples of posts where such a tag would be unambiguously correct, I might support creating a new tag. It's just hard for me to conceive of a case where this wouldn't be overly redundant or subjective.

Updated by DanbooruBot

iridescent_slime said:

If you see characters on a "date" discussing payment, or money changing hands, then it should probably just be tagged prostitution.

Otherwise, without any apparent indication that one character is paying the other, I don't see how you're supposed to distinguish this activity from ordinary interactions between couples. Maybe they're just on a regular date? Anything beyond that is a matter of individual interpretation.

If you can provide examples of posts where such a tag would be unambiguously correct, I might support creating a new tag. It's just hard for me to conceive of a case where this wouldn't be overly redundant or subjective.

I was thinking about something directly related to or as a byproduct of the enjo kousai character ranking poll, but I guess prostitution tag would do in this case, thanks.

Updated by DanbooruBot