post #9118665
jirai_kei or something else?
Posted under Tags
post #9118665
jirai_kei or something else?
imo jirai is personality type. think gyaru.
Part of ocean that appear to be darker because there is abyss down there
post #9716801
Placeholder1996 said:
- does zoom layer count against solo?
Looking at the search zoom_layer solo, I don't think it does, as long as the zoom layer is identical to the front layer.
post #9718608 never mind, I answered my own question.
post #9238252
post #9238232
post #9199063
None of the above three works violate any regulations, and other works by the same author have not been deleted from danbooru. There are many styles of art, and they should not be misunderstood and deleted. We look forward to and appreciate your response.
I had add more tag. please pass them.
astrates said:
post #9238252
post #9238232
post #9199063None of the above three works violate any regulations, and other works by the same author have not been deleted from danbooru. There are many styles of art, and they should not be misunderstood and deleted. We look forward to and appreciate your response.
I had add more tag. please pass them.
Check topic #7934 for upload feedback. This thread is for questions on how to tag only.
Does anyone know what exactly the thing in front of him is?
Should the invisible tag be used for images where a character is fully invisible (post #9649858) or can it also be used for characters that are implied to be invisible? (Like transparent or outlined; post #7064053)
I presume it depends on the context of the image, but the wiki asks to use transparent if the character appears transparent, so should the latter example be tagged as both invisible and transparent? But then there's also implied invisibility?
I just got a little confused lol
rainyd said:
Should the invisible tag be used for images where a character is fully invisible (post #9649858) or can it also be used for characters that are implied to be invisible? (Like transparent or outlined; post #7064053)
I presume it depends on the context of the image, but the wiki asks to use transparent if the character appears transparent, so should the latter example be tagged as both invisible and transparent? But then there's also implied invisibility?
I just got a little confused lol
For post #7064053 I'd use implied invisibility, not invisible. Whether transparent should be used is a little less clear; I wouldn't personally though.
Placeholder1996 said:
For post #7064053 I'd use implied invisibility, not invisible. Whether transparent should be used is a little less clear; I wouldn't personally though.
Gotcha, thank you very much! Out of curiosity, would you also use implied invisibility for post #9715702 and post #9703235?
rainyd said:
Gotcha, thank you very much! Out of curiosity, would you also use implied invisibility for post #9715702 and post #9703235?
I’d use transparent for the first and implied invisibility for the second. For the first post, we don’t have any context within the image itself that she’s actually invisible, which is why I prefer transparent. That context exists in the other image.
Placeholder1996 said:
I’d use transparent for the first and implied invisibility for the second. For the first post, we don’t have any context within the image itself that she’s actually invisible, which is why I prefer transparent. That context exists in the other image.
Understood. Thank you!
post #9733152 could implied fingering apply here?
Is there a tag for the cord-like attachments found in some uniforms like in post #9728431?
AStarSavior said:
Is there a tag for the cord-like attachments found in some uniforms like in post #9728431?
Aiguillette, I believe.
Placeholder1996 said:
Aiguillette, I believe.
Thanks for this. Would also like to ask how to tag the massive "mana cannon" shown in post #9735079.