Tag implication: water_droplets -> water_drop

create implication water_droplets -> water_drop

Link to implication

A droplet is a small drop.

It's a plural to singular alias so I'll go with it.

Shouldn't water drop also imply water?

Would water drop still imply water if it's only a picture of a droplet, like in post #2201514?

post #2201514 would disqualify the implication.

See also topic #6038 and topic #6155, where water is largely left unimplicated due to an image's focus.

I just now discovered the tag droplets.

I'm thinking of implicating it as well, but I'm not sure. A droplet is a lot more broad than water_droplets after all, like in post #2247812.

The tag implication water_droplets -> water_drop has been rejected.