Posted under Tags
create implication frilled_hairband -> frills
create implication frilled_hairband -> hairband
All the other major frilled_* tags already implicate both the object and frills.
EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The bulk update request #1322 (forum #137037) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
I tried asking about this in topic #13799. I'm not sure if it got resolved or not.
Hm, I tried checking the forums before making this but the search returned no results for me. But as someone else points out in the thread, lolita hairbands do not necessarily have frills. And for example I wouldn't say post #2854864 is a lolita hairband or a maid headdress, despite having frills and being an hairband.
nonamethanks said:
But as someone else points out in the thread, lolita hairbands do not necessarily have frills. And for example I wouldn't say post #2854864 is a lolita hairband or a maid headdress, despite having frills and being an hairband.
Yeah, I agree. This is one of those cases where there's a lot of overlap, but not all of one is the other.
The bulk update request #1322 (forum #137037) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
create implication frilled_hairband -> frills
create implication frilled_hairband -> hairband
Rejected due to 60 days - still wants to go ahead as far as I can see.
And a +1 as well
EDIT: The bulk update request #1651 (forum #146344) has been rejected by @skylightcrystal.
Updated by DanbooruBot
The bulk update request #1651 (forum #146344) has been rejected by @skylightcrystal.
