We have large_insertion and insertion, but no relation between the two. I don't care for the tag, so if you think they'd be better off merged, that's fine too.
Updated by a moderator
Posted under General
We have large_insertion and insertion, but no relation between the two. I don't care for the tag, so if you think they'd be better off merged, that's fine too.
Updated by a moderator
RaisingK said:
We have large_insertion and insertion, but no relation between the two. I don't care for the tag, so if you think they'd be better off merged, that's fine too.
Large_insertion and insertion shouldn't be merged, in my opinion. why not? Because the insertion tag is for insertions which are not natural things to put into a vagina (e.g. pencil, vibrator, watermelon).
The large insertion tag should be used for ANY large insertion entering a female, includng giant penisses, or large fists (see: fisting).
albert said:
Need a metric for what constitute large.
Yes, that's definitely needed. But then again, I think we can all agree that the images that are tagged with large insertion have some very large insertions (sometimes impossible to insert without getting some serious injury). So lets just use the tag for everything that almost everyone will find 'large'.
I don't think we should give an exact length and widt for that tag. But if you want that, I think the length of half of the characters arm in which the insertion is placed could be called large. I can't really give a size for the width, though. Also, every image with a stomach_bulge tag could be tagged large insertion.