[REJECTED] Tag implication: bikini_under_clothes -> swimsuit_under_clothes

create implication bikini_under_clothes -> swimsuit_under_clothes

Link to implication

A bikini is a type of swimsuit, so this one should be self-explanatory.

EDIT: The tag implication bikini_under_clothes -> swimsuit_under_clothes (forum #147906) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

This was rejected before in topic #12572, because it was decided in previous threads (pointed out there) not to do any bikini->swimsuit implications besides the base tags.

It's not just any swimsuit type, but the highleg bikini under short-shorts or a miniskirt used in what one Japanese artist calls a "show-pan" style.

That is what "bikini under clothes" is referring to.

EB said:

This was rejected before in topic #12572, because it was decided in previous threads (pointed out there) not to do any bikini->swimsuit implications besides the base tags.

I do think it's silly to have to search two separate times with different tags because searching a character tag or something with swimsuit_under_clothes will cause you to miss out on about 50 pages worth of pictures. I guess this mainly is a problem for general accounts.

g3gen said:

It's not just any swimsuit type, but the highleg bikini under short-shorts or a miniskirt used in what one Japanese artist calls a "show-pan" style.

That is what "bikini under clothes" is referring to.

This is not always the case with the tag, though, and it's immediately obvious if you search it. Perhaps you need a different tag for that concept? edit: there's only five pages of highleg_bikini and bikini_under_swimsuit, nevermind

DreamFromTheLayer said:

I do think it's silly to have to search two separate times with different tags because searching a character tag or something with swimsuit_under_clothes will cause you to miss out on about 50 pages worth of pictures.

This implication creates a another problem, though, which isn't as easily overcome: If you want to search specifically for one-piece swimsuits worn under clothing but no bikinis, the bikini_under_clothes -> swimsuit_under_clothes implication will result in you having to trawl through a ton of false positives. You could add -bikini to your search but this would also filter out a lot of images with additional characters.

I guess this mainly is a problem for general accounts.

It's an incentive to upgrade.

The tag implication bikini_under_clothes -> swimsuit_under_clothes (forum #147906) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.