Danbooru

[REJECTED] Tag implication: ass_visible_through_thighs -> thighs

Posted under Tags

create implication ass_visible_through_thighs -> thighs

Link to implication

The thighs must be visible to use the ass_visible_through_thighs tag.

I don't know if there are any specific conditions to use the thighs tag, the wiki page doesn't make it clear; if there are thighs in the image, we can use it, right? please, correct me if I'm wrong.

EDIT: The tag implication ass_visible_through_thighs -> thighs (forum #147993) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

Updated by DanbooruBot

feet wiki page says: This tag is for images in which one of the focuses is the character's feet. Note it does not cover shoes. However, feet covered by sandals, socks, thighhighs, or pantyhose still count.

hands wiki page says: Use this tag when an image has a character's hand(s) as the main focus or emphasizes the usage of hands.

Thighs wiki page doesn't explain how to use it. Thanks by the way.

Thighs wiki page doesn't explain how to use it.

Yeah, it really doesn't. For thighs, I go by if they are sumptuous-looking and draw the eye in. Being exposed or surrounded by skintight clothes is also important.

From the front:
From the back:
From the side:

Discussion

One thing that should probably be hashed out though is if there is a minimum/maximum amount of the thigh that should be shown for it to count.

1. If there is too little thigh, then should it even be tagged? (post #3163305, post #3162541)
2. If there is a lot more of leg, should it be the legs tag instead? (post #3162893, post #3163418)

If either of the above are true, then what should the cutoffs be, if any? It'd nice to have something somewhat quantifiable.

For thighs, I go by if they are sumptuous-looking and draw the eye in. Being exposed or surrounded by skintight clothes is also important.

Ok, maybe I should have created a topic asking for help about this tag, anyway, thanks for the help, BrokenEagle.

1