[APPROVED] Fate Character Swimsuit Ver. Implications

remove implication oda_nobunaga_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate) -> oda_nobunaga_(fate)
create implication bb_(swimsuit_mooncancer)_(fate) -> bb_(fate)_(all)
create implication bb_(fate/extra_ccc) -> bb_(fate)_(all)
create implication medb_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate) -> medb_(fate)_(all)
create implication medb_(fate/grand_order) -> medb_(fate)_(all)

Link to request

This is how Fate character implications work for every other character with multiple forms. Requesting this for consistency.
If this gets approved, I'll write another BUR that will look like this...

imply oda_nobunaga_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate) -> oda_nobunaga_(fate)_(all)
imply oda_nobunaga_(fate) -> oda_nobunaga_(fate)_(all)
char:oda_nobunaga_(fate)_(all)

EDIT: The bulk update request #1770 (forum #149561) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

The bulk update request #1770 (forum #149561) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

create implication oda_nobunaga_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate) -> oda_nobunaga_(fate)_(all)
create implication oda_nobunaga_(fate) -> oda_nobunaga_(fate)_(all)
remove implication ushiwakamaru_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> ushiwakamaru_(fate/grand_order)
create implication ushiwakamaru_(fate/grand_order) -> ushiwakamaru_(fate)_(all)
create implication ushiwakamaru_(swimsuit_assassin)_(fate) -> ushiwakamaru_(fate)_(all)
remove implication ibaraki_douji_(swimsuit_lancer)_(fate) -> ibaraki_douji_(fate/grand_order)
create implication ibaraki_douji_(fate/grand_order) -> ibaraki_douji_(fate)_(all)
create implication ibaraki_douji_(swimsuit_lancer)_(fate) -> ibaraki_douji_(fate)_(all)

Link to request

Follow up to the previous post in this thread, as well as fixing some incorrect implications that were approved.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1781 (forum #149825) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

So we are just gonna make (all) tags for every servant that gets a second form now?

-1, having (all) tags for characters that only have two tags is excessive. I don't understand how this started, we never had problems with Kantai Collection's Kai/Kai Ni versions falling under remodel (kantai collection).

+1 to the two above comments, I understand Fate tagging is a mess but creating _(all) tags for every Servant that gets a new form is more than excessive.

Many of those alternate forms barely differ from the original Servant anyways - like Cu Lancer and Cu Caster, or basically every summer version, or etc. Having individual tag for every single form of a Servant is imho more than overkill unless they're very distinct forms (eg. Saber Arturia and Lancer Arturia.)

Making general tags for new outfits like the wicked_dragon_witch_ver._shinjuku_1999 could work but creating new character tags and (all) tags for everything is ridiculous.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #1781 (forum #149825) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

nonamethanks said:

I don't understand how this started, we never had problems with Kantai Collection's Kai/Kai Ni versions falling under remodel (kantai collection).

I laugh at this statement as I do a akitsu_maru_(kantai_collection) -remodel_(kantai_collection) search and see black akitsu maru left and right.

It's not so much that there's no problem, but that there's simply no demands for it.