[APPROVED] Tag implication: bald_girl -> bald

create implication bald_girl -> bald

Link to implication

Seems pretty obvious, really. Unless anyone thinks bald_girl should have a wider (or narrower?) range of applicability than bald?

The wiki just defines bald_girl as "A bald female character."

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The tag implication bald_girl -> bald (forum #150164) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

+1.

This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The tag implication bald_girl -> bald (forum #150164) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.