Posted under Tags
create alias knees_touching -> knees_together_feet_apart
Same usage. knees_together_feet_apart is less ambiguous.
EDIT: This tag alias is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.
EDIT: This tag alias has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The tag alias knees_touching -> knees_together_feet_apart (forum #151251) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
Despite the wiki, the tag's ambiguous name does nothing to indicate that the character's feet should be apart. Some of the posts tagged knees_touching (like post #1739859, post #1815797, post #2723090, post #3059732, etc.) are clearly legs_together. Rather than an alias, it would be better to manually migrate the posts to either knees_together_feet_apart or legs_together, whichever fits best. The same should be done for knees_together.
iridescent_slime said:
Despite the wiki, the tag's ambiguous name does nothing to indicate that the character's feet should be apart. Some of the posts tagged knees_touching (like post #1739859, post #1815797, post #2723090, post #3059732, etc.) are clearly legs_together. Rather than an alias, it would be better to manually migrate the posts to either knees_together_feet_apart or legs_together, whichever fits best. The same should be done for knees_together.
I would +1 this but there are quite a few things in both tags in the style of post #3220594 which don't really fit either, and I wouldn't want knees together feet apart to have things like post #2353815 either.
It's definitely better than an alias though.
ah, I cleaned out the legs together, leg hug, seiza, wariza posts before the request but seem like there's still some more left.
Should I turn this tag to a placeholder to other knees-touching tags (similar to in water) or just move them all and delete it?
To skylightcrystal examples,
post #3220594 is knees_together_feet_together with pigeon-toed (there're plenty posts tag like that)
post #2353815 gives the same visual to knees_together_feet_part (more posts, the result would be better if you cross out sitting tag)
I know it's not perfect but we could searching those poses this way so why keeping an ambiguous tag like knees_together?
yelite said:
ah, I cleaned out the legs together, leg hug, seiza, wariza posts before the request but seem like there's still some more left.
Should I turn this tag to a placeholder to other knees-touching tags (similar to in water) or just move them all and delete it?
To skylightcrystal examples,
post #3220594 is knees_together_feet_together with pigeon-toed (there're plenty posts tag like that)
post #2353815 gives the same visual to knees_together_feet_part (more posts, the result would be better if you cross out sitting tag)
I know it's not perfect but we could searching those poses this way so why keeping an ambiguous tag like knees_together?
The first is a result of the knees_together_feet_together tag (which inherently just means that those two parts are together and says nothing about the rest of the legs) having been aliased to legs_together, which is supposed to be for when the entirety of the leg is together. I don't like that alias either, and the one proposed in this thread would just create a similar alias.
And yes, I know that knees_together_feet_apart has been used for those sorts of post in the past (most of the things in that search result aren't the same though) but I still don't like it.
The tag alias knees_touching -> knees_together_feet_apart (forum #151251) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
