[REJECTED] Tag implication: sitonai -> illyasviel_von_einzbern

create implication sitonai -> illyasviel_von_einzbern

Link to implication

Fate series implications stuff. This is pretty much already the case, I forgot the Illya tag on a Sitonai upload and someone added the tag. Anyone have any reason not to do this implication?

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The tag implication sitonai -> illyasviel_von_einzbern (forum #152358) has been rejected by @Type-kun.

We really need to sort out when a character should imply the base chartag versus when they should imply an *_(all) tag. We have a lot of inconsistencies here and it's confusing.

I see at least four different versions of this character - basic Fate/Stay Night version, Prisma Illya, Sitonai, and Chloe von Einzbern (maybe?) - which suggests an Illyasviel von Einzbern (all) implication instead.

I don't think it's a stretch to say that Chloe is generally treated as a different character, so she shouldn't imply Illya.

So, Illyasviel von Einzbern and Sitonai should imply Illyasviel von Einzbern (all) .

As for the Prisma Illya tag, I found it has that whole 'magical girl identity' tagging rule debate surrounding it (topic #14463), though I'd personally imply it to the (all) tag for that as well.

This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The tag implication sitonai -> illyasviel_von_einzbern (forum #152358) has been rejected by @Type-kun.