[APPROVED] [BULK] Multiple_hair_bows and single_leg_pantyhose

BUR #1957 has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

create implication multiple_hair_bows -> hair_bow

Reason: Pantyhose only covering one leg seems to be an emerging trend with character designs lately, so I figured it should be populated and implicated. As for multiple hair bows, I changed it from multiple_bows to be more specific to three or more hair bows, and have been populating it gradually.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1957 (forum #155031) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

Does asymmetrical_legwear apply to cases where one leg is completely bare? Single thighhigh etc. also do not imply asymmetrical_legwear

Pantyhose is used on almost exactly half the single_leg_pantyhose images. I'm unsure as to whether or not it really counts.

Does multiple_hair_bows want to exist at all?

Removed single_leg_pantyhose -> asymmetrical_legwear

skylightcrystal said:

Does asymmetrical_legwear apply to cases where one leg is completely bare? Single thighhigh etc. also do not imply asymmetrical_legwear

For some reason I thought it did, looking through some other asymmetrical_* tags it doesn't seem to be the case.

skylightcrystal said:

Pantyhose is used on almost exactly half the single_leg_pantyhose images. I'm unsure as to whether or not it really counts.

I'd say it does, it's still pantyhose just like single pantsleg are still pants.

skylightcrystal said:

Does multiple_hair_bows want to exist at all?

I've been wondering the same myself.

If you want guys me to nuke multiple_hair_bows instead of populate it, I can do that.

Pantyhose is used on almost exactly half the single_leg_pantyhose images. I'm unsure as to whether or not it really counts.

I'm not sure I follow your logic. I tagged pretty much all relevant posts in single_leg_pantyhose, making sure they were actually pantyhose rather than a single pantsleg or a thighhigh shown at some angle.

Benit149 said:

I'm not sure I follow your logic. I tagged pretty much all relevant posts in single_leg_pantyhose, making sure they were actually pantyhose rather than a single pantsleg or a thighhigh shown at some angle.

He means that only half of the posts under single leg pantyhose are tagged with pantyhose and wonders if they count as pantyhose or not.

Unbreakable said:

He means that only half of the posts under single leg pantyhose are tagged with pantyhose and wonders if they count as pantyhose or not.

I would think so. That's why I made the single_leg_pantyhose -> pantyhose request. Yet at the same time, single pantsleg doesn't imply pants, which I didn't know about until now. Browsing through single_pantsleg posts made me think that some of the images could be better tagged single_leg_pantyhose, but I didn't do anything for now. Maybe a single_leg_pantyhose -> single_pantsleg alias would make things easier instead? Or a new blanket tag to cover this style regardless if they're pants, pantyhose, part of a bodysuit or whatever?

BTW, I had the single_leg_pantyhose -> asymmetrical_legwear request because I feel it's technically asymmetrical in and itself, since an entire leg's worth of fabric is missing. But if asymmetrical_legwear is meant to refer to both legs, then that's fine. Even so, single pantsleg has the asymmetrical clothes implication, so couldn't single leg pantyhose at least have the same thing?

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #1957 (forum #155031) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

Approved multiple_hair_bows -> hair_bow, but rejected the single_leg_pantyhose -> pantyhose. Only rejected it for now to allow further discussion, since the similar single_pantsleg tag also lacks this type of implication.

post #3490757 got tagged with asymmetrical legwear because it depicted a single thighhigh only. Is that correct? When I think of either asymmetrical legwear or mismatched legwear, I usually think of both legs covered.

By the way, single thighhigh implicates thighhighs. Does this mean single leg pantyhose should implicate pantyhose?

Bumping for other opinions on the above ^

I'd say that single thighhighs shouldn't be tagged asymmetrical legwear. Otherwise single thighhigh should imply asymmetrical legwear, but doing so would flood the tag (~15k posts vs ~6k posts). Generally speaking, asymmetrical_* is for differences in length/height/size between two items in a pair, while mismatched_* is for differences in color/pattern.

As for single leg pantyhose / single pantsleg, I'd support merging them into a blanket tag. I suggest single-legged or maybe single-legged clothes. There are some things under single_pantsleg bodysuit that aren't really pants or pantyhose.

I'd support the latter name if we go this route since single-legged will probably be mistaken as normal legs instead of clothing legs.

evazion said:
As for single leg pantyhose / single pantsleg, I'd support merging them into a blanket tag. I suggest single-legged or maybe single-legged clothes. There are some things under single_pantsleg bodysuit that aren't really pants or pantyhose.

I was thinking of something along the same line, but didn't know what to call the blanket tag. I prefer single-legged clothes since it specifies that it's apparel rather than the character just having one leg.