[REJECTED] Tag implication: bright_background -> backlighting

tag implication #9211 bright_background -> backlighting has been rejected.

Reason: Following the pattern of "blurry background", "simple background", and "[color] background", many people may assume backlighting is "bright background".

In other words by making "bright background" imply "backlighting" more people will be able to find the tag they want.

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication bright_background -> backlighting (forum #156950) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Bright background tag is empty though and I see no reason for it not to be, so I'm not sure if you meant it as an alias instead.

Oh, yup. Sorry, I meant to put the request as an alias.

Should I make a new thread?

If you make a BUR you can put this topic in the last field and it will put it here instead of having to make a new one.

A bit new around here.

Can you explain to me what a BUR is (or how to use ti)?

It's mostly used as a way to request several aliases/implications at once, it can also be be used to put your request in an existing topic instead of making a new one as the regular ones always do. Just follow the instructions on the page and you'll do fine, if you mess up it's easy to edit it afterwards.

Thanks!

This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The tag implication bright_background -> backlighting (forum #156950) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.