Missing frills implications

BUR #3281 has been rejected.

None of the colored frill tags implicate frills, same with specific types of frills

EDIT: The bulk update request #3281 (forum #171469) has been rejected by @evazion.

Center frills has been discussed before in topic #14943 and topic #12522

And I don't see the point in having colour_frills tags.

As much as I am for colored tags, I don't agree with having them for frills.

Then there's gonna need to have with the already existing colored frills tag, since many posts are tagged with the color_frills tag, but not frills (i.e there are 590 posts with white_frills and 105 don't have the frills tag

The bulk update request #3281 (forum #171469) has been rejected by @evazion.

• Tagging frill colors is really excessive to me, I would prefer nuking these tags.
• Frill trim is redundant. Frills are normally trim.
• Center frills still needs a wiki. An implication seems fine, but it has to have a wiki first.

BUR #3325 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication center_frills -> frills
mass update frill_trim -> frills
mass update black_frills -> frills
mass update white_frills -> frills
mass update multicolored_frills -> frills
mass update brown_frills -> frills
mass update purple_frills -> frills
mass update grey_frills -> frills
mass update print_frills -> frills
mass update orange_frills -> frills
mass update white_frills -> frills
mass update pink_frills -> frills
mass update aqua_frills -> frills
mass update yellow_frills -> frills
mass update green_frills -> frills
mass update blue_frills -> frills
mass update red_frills -> frills

To nuke the coloured frills tags and add it to images, where it´s still missing.

I created the wiki for center frills (maybe someone can make a better one), but I found out, that not everyone agrees with that name. For now I think it´s fine. If someone has a better name, we could discuss this, too.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3325 (forum #171752) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #3325 (forum #171752) has been approved by @evazion.