BUR #4403 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication crotchless_pantyhose -> pantyhose
create implication crotchless_pants -> pants
create implication crotchless_swimsuit -> crotchless
Should be self-explanatory.
Posted under Tags
BUR #4403 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication crotchless_pantyhose -> pantyhose
create implication crotchless_pants -> pants
create implication crotchless_swimsuit -> crotchless
Should be self-explanatory.
These implications seem fine. On a side note though, isn't a good portion of the crotchless_pants tag just chaps?
NWF_Renim said:
These implications seem fine. On a side note though, isn't a good portion of the crotchless_pants tag just chaps?
If you mean something like this, then sure, I would call those pants. But most chaps look more like this, which are not what I would call pants. Some go even lower than those. Most chaps aren't tagged as pants or crotchless pants, either.
blindVigil said:
If you mean something like this, then sure, I would call those pants. But most chaps look more like this, which are not what I would call pants. Some go even lower than those. Most chaps aren't tagged as pants or crotchless pants, either.
I think you have misunderstood me, I mean that a lot of what is being tagged as crotchless_pants should instead have been tagged chaps.
NWF_Renim said:
I think you have misunderstood me, I mean that a lot of what is being tagged as crotchless_pants should instead have been tagged chaps.
Ahhh, yeah, I see what you mean now. My blacklist was hiding the mistagged posts
The bulk update request #4403 (forum #178760) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #4403 (forum #178760) has been approved by @evazion.