chest_belt and chest_strap each have no wiki, and there's a lot of inconsistency to their tagging.
chest_belt is used for everything from post #1964143 (more like a chest_harness), post #2806440 (a single belt loosely slung around torso), post #2879337 (part of a bikini), post #3158941 (decorative addition to dress), post #4221275 (a buckle-less strap crossing over cleavage), post #3949721 (buckle-less strap going encircling torso and covering nipples) to post #4154571 (a purely decorative buckle).
chest_strap usage includes post #3535976 (literally a belt) post #3271101 (also a belt), post #3934673 (harness?), post #3720050 (part of a criss-cross_halter), post #3381186 (holding a shirt closed), post #3787278 (bondage_outfit), post #3324444 (ribbon in maid outfit cleavage cutout?) and post #3890095 (encircling the base of the breasts).
An example, Surtr's outfit is often tagged with chest_belt, only a few times with chest_strap, and often without either.
There's also some posts under chest_harness which might be better under one of these (e.g. post #4300991, post #4108848).
Mano Aloe's outfit is usually just chest_harness, sometimes also chest_belt (post #4051440) or also chest_strap (post #4057573) and quite often neither of the three (post #4455067).
I would suggest that either:
a) just alias chest_belt -> chest_strap, or
b) we come up with an actual rule for applying them and put it in the wikis
e.g. chest_strap must have a buckle, must be a closed loop, and not be a harness. Anything else is chest_strap
There's also the issue of whether a chest_belt/strap can go below the breasts, e.g. post #4466610, or even lower post #4291499. I would suggest it has to be directly below and touching the breasts, and otherwise its just a belt