BUR #5922 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication cable_tail -> tail
For consistency with all other tail tags. I've already added the tail tag to cable tail posts that were missing it, but we automate what we can, no?
Posted under Tags
BUR #5922 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication cable_tail -> tail
For consistency with all other tail tags. I've already added the tail tag to cable tail posts that were missing it, but we automate what we can, no?
Wasn't sure initially, but since cable tail is defined as a tail anyway (and the tagged images look like tail), might as well.
+1
The bulk update request #5922 (forum #189069) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #8603 has been rejected.
create implication [[cable_tail]] -> [[cable]]
The obvious other side of this one that I should have thought of when I made the first BUR. A tail made of cable is inherently a cable that happens to be attached to someone's backside.
I have, as before, already manually added cable to the cable_tail posts that lacked it.
Updated by ElGranFracaso
The bulk update request #8603 (forum #204090) has been rejected by @ElGranFracaso.
BUR #8613 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication cable_tail -> cable
Corrected. As stated above, this one is the obvious companion to the cable_tail → tail implication. If a cable tail is obviously a tail, it's also obviously a cable.
Nameless_Contributor said:
For the future, you can edit your own BURs, so you wouldn't have needed to reject it and create a new one.
Is there a particular way to do that for BURs that are downthread from the main topic? I tried to edit the one I'd broken with DText, but the editor that came up was only the standard reply editor, not the BUR editor. So it didn't provide the option to edit the BUR attached to the reply, just the reply itself.
Edit: Never mind, I figured it out.
Updated by ElGranFracaso
The bulk update request #8613 (forum #204166) has been approved by @evazion.