tejina senpai character and series qualifier swap

Posted under Tags

testingmmmmm

BUR #5950 has been rejected.

create alias tejina_senpai_(character) -> tejina_senpai_(tejina_senpai)

Consistency with the franchise qualifier. Redundancy is indeed ugly, yet the alternative is senpai_(tejina_senpai) (which both wikipedia and MAL treat it as her main name) which I presume may be more confusing and still redundant.

If you agree it could be left to 'tejina' which wouldn't be ambiguous now due to the very presence of her name(＞ｍ＜) in the franchise (like shana) but it's been some years and the series is already kind of forgotten tbh, doesn't seem future-proofed to me.

Updated by testingmmmmm

Reply
user 499293 Alex MKW Mexiguy
NNescio

ljhkhjkghjybtvhyt said:

BUR #5950 has been rejected.

create alias tejina_senpai_(character) -> tejina_senpai_(tejina_senpai)

Consistency with the franchise qualifier. Redundancy is indeed ugly, yet the alternative is senpai_(tejina_senpai) (which both wikipedia and MAL treat it as her main name) which I presume may be more confusing and still redundant.

"Tejina" just means magic (tricks) though. If we need to put the franchise qualifier in, then senpai_(tejina_senpai) or the ugly tejina_senpai_(tejina_senpai) would be better. Or maybe Tejina-senpai_(Tejina_Senpai), to distinguish between the character and series.

Overall, nobody calls her just "tejina", so voting down.

Reply
evazion

For eponymous characters (characters with the same name as the copyright), it's common to qualify the series with *_(series) and leave the main character unqualified.

See:

This is usually shorter at least than leaving the series unqualified and qualifying the main character with *_(character) or *_(redundant_series_name).

Reply
1