Single Bare shoulder

BUR #6329 has been rejected.

create implication single_bare_shoulder -> bare_shoulders

Just wanting to know what the overall opinion regarding that tag as a whole is (should it even exist since it's a typical singular->plural situation?) and if it should, isn't it kinda a subset of bare_shoulders?

single_glove currently implies gloves
therefore single_bare_shoulder should imply bare_shoulders

I don't really like the idea of this implication, given how different images with one bare shoulder inevitably are to those with two.

It's not really comparable to clothing items.

I'm kinda "meh" on the existence of the tag in general.

Unbreakable said:

I'm kinda "meh" on the existence of the tag in general.

Same

skylightcrystal said:

I don't really like the idea of this implication, given how different images with one bare shoulder inevitably are to those with two.

It's not really comparable to clothing items.

I agree. It's not like clothing where we have to tag colors, features etc as well and it would be a pain without any real advantage to distinguish between one or two instances of the same item. In this case a single bare shoulder can create a very different effect, the most classic being the slip like post #4692836 or post #4675077.

The bulk update request #6329 (forum #191823) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.