imply pussy/penis peek to pussy/penis

BUR #6523 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication penis_peek -> penis

If a penis is visible, even partially, it should be tagged.

BUR #6524 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication pussy_peek -> pussy

Ditto.

Making this one separate because the wiki defines "pussy peek" to include pubic_hair_peek, and because there's an implication from clitoris_slip, even though clitoris doesn't imply pussy (there are ~1900 posts under clitoris not tagged pussy).

I edited the wiki because that definition made no sense. Seems it was added in 2009 and never touched again.

I don't think this is necessarily applicable to some of the edge cases like post #4600250.

I definitely wouldn't tag pussy there.

Gollgagh said:

I don't think this is necessarily applicable to some of the edge cases like post #4600250.

I definitely wouldn't tag pussy there.

Yeah then it shouldn't be tagged pussy_peek either.

the degree in which the pussy is shown seems to be nicely considered in the rating of each post so I see no drawback

The bulk update request #6524 (forum #193060) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #6523 (forum #193059) has been approved by @evazion.