Danbooru

panties on face

Posted under Tags

BUR #6639 has been rejected.

remove implication panty_mask -> panties_on_head
create alias panty_mask -> panties_on_face
create alias mask_panties -> panties_on_face
create implication panties_on_face -> panties_on_head

This is a small and very niche thing, but when looking at tags that might be impacted by the proposal in topic #19214, I was surprised to find that there was no tag for panties_on_face.

It's not like that's an especially common thing, but it comes to mind as a relatively common comedic gag for say pool #3171 (Perverted Homura), or likewise "pervert" or "panty thief" characters (Muten_Roushi, Happosai, etc), either canonically or as a fan meme. Looking at what's out there, this is apparently less frequent than I had assumed it was, but for panties_on_face to not be a tag felt surprising.

It looks like we actually have two small tags (neither with a wiki) that cover this topic:

Despite covering a small number of posts, the age of the older tag, the fact that it was largely used by well established members, and the fact that an implication was involved made me think it'd be good to bring up here. Aside from the implication, this would be easy to tag garden, but having aliases might make logical sense here given the fact that the older tag seems well established (at least historically) too. The implication covers a much smaller set of posts than we usually allow for as of late, but it still makes sense, so it wouldn't hurt to move it forward too if the system still allows for it.

As for the argument behind the proposal, matter-of-fact tag names similar to *_on_head have been the typical style for tags on Danbooru for a very long time now, and panties_on_face is basically the simplest, most obvious, and most matter-of-fact way to describe this topic. Both panty_mask and mask_panties make sense, but they have more of the meme flavor that used to be common in tag names back when Danbooru first started (which makes sense for 2008). It's probably a good idea to update the name (in my opinion).

Updated

Yeah, actually looking closer, it does seem to be the reverse case. Using a surgical mask as panties rather than panties as a mask, most of them look ambiguous at a quick glance, but there clearly aren't any real panties in say post #4329843, only masks. It's probably disingenuous to actually call them panties now that I'm thinking about it. I'll reject this then, just clean things up manually, and add wikis to explain things.

1