clothing aside mistagging

BUR #6741 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication buruma_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication dress_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication thong_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication leotard_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication shorts_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication bikini_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication swimsuit_aside -> clothing_aside

Wiki for clothing aside says that, use the tag if it doesn't fit the implications I've put on this BUR, yet more than half of the images on clothing aside uses those tags as well. Although making it a catch all tag seems a better idea to me, but if people are against it, somebody should garden that tag.

Also couldn't add panties aside because it doesn't make up 90% of the other or whatever.

I agree, it doesn't make much sense to have a tag for "everything else".

pronebone said:

Also couldn't add panties aside because it doesn't make up 90% of the other or whatever.

Post count for ~bikini_aside ~shorts_aside ~swimsuit_aside ~leotard_aside ~thong_aside ~dress_aside ~buruma_aside -panties_aside status:any: 7848

So if this goes through then panties aside should become implicable.

Tangential to this BUR, but some of these tags also show the clothing being aside for the breasts, rather than genitals.

swimsuit_aside one_breast_out pussy for example had some of these mistags. I fixed the ones I saw, but there could be more hidden.

Yeah, this makes sense to me too. If you do a search for the above negating the other *_aside tags, it looks like they are virtually all just missing the more specific tag they ought to have had. There are a few cases of one breast out or breasts outside in there too (e.g. post #3381535), but that wouldn't be affected by this, nor does it match the definition written in the wiki for clothing aside.

The bulk update request #6741 (forum #194321) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #6781 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication panties_aside -> clothing_aside
create implication dress_aside -> dress
create implication shorts_aside -> shorts

Missing implications.

Do we want to turn swimsuit_aside into one-piece swimsuit aside, so it's exclusively for one pieces? Because swimsuit_aside bikini has 273 posts, but we have bikini aside and no tag for one-pieces.

nonamethanks said:
Do we want to turn swimsuit_aside into one-piece swimsuit aside, so it's exclusively for one pieces? Because swimsuit_aside bikini has 273 posts, but we have bikini aside and no tag for one-pieces.

We can also have one-piece swimsuit aside and bikini aside and have them imply swimsuit aside. But if that's over complicating tags, your suggestion will do as well.

The bulk update request #6781 (forum #194523) has been approved by @nonamethanks.