Cum and x-rays

BUR #7016 has been rejected.

create alias internal_cumshot -> cum_in_uterus

Standard "wiki clauses that nobody reads causing mistags because of the name" alias.

People are tagging anal cumshots as internal cumshot, but the wiki makes it clear that it's intended for x-ray shots of people cumming directly into the womb/uterus. Nobody reads wikis. The name does not make it clear. Making the name clear and doing some gardening is a simple solution.

internal cumshot is also being used for stuff like cumdrips and after sex shots. The tag needs some serious cleanup if we want it to just be for cum in uterus.

Alright, then the question is whether we want it to be purely for that or if we rewrite the definition to be any form of cum_in_orifice + x-ray/cross section.

I could garden relevant posts into cum_in_uterus but it would have to be de-aliased from internal_cumshot first.

Cum_in_uterus is way too specific for a tag that has never actually made mention of a uterus in its wiki. Some pedant is going to use this rename as an excuse for removing the tag from posts like post #1310830 and post #3703534 because the artist didn't draw the uterus, even though these posts obviously fit the tag's intended use.

iridescent_slime said:

Cum_in_uterus is way too specific for a tag that has never actually made mention of a uterus in its wiki. Some pedant is going to use this rename as an excuse for removing the tag from posts like post #1310830 and post #3703534 because the artist didn't draw the uterus, even though these posts obviously fit the tag's intended use.

Then why not nuke the tag into cum in pussy + x-ray or cross-section?

You then lose the "internal" aspect of the tag. Maybe we do just rewrite internal_cumshot's definition? Or rename it to something more specific like internal_vaginal_cumshot, then it doesn't matter if the uterus is included or not.

Originally the wiki referred to cum inside, which got aliased to cum in pussy at some point. I don't think it was meant to preclude anal.

The bulk update request #7016 (forum #195741) has been rejected by @evazion.