Posted under Tags
bad source originally included "links to a completely different image", but now that Danbooru maintains the tag automatically for something different, a new tag is need for irrelevant sources. In my case, I'm concerned with cases where a pixiv artist "revises" an image collection to no longer contain certain images (e.g. pixiv #69181924 and post #3169552).
evazion suggests source mismatch (issue #5161). Thoughts?
What about just wrong source? Right, that wouldn't work because the source was once correct. source mismatch is probably better, since it also follows md5 mismatch.
I remembered you raising this issue with me back when I originally went through the bad_*, to ensure that the tag could still be used for that given purpose (as for all intents and purposes, it was a bad source now). It is a shame that the recent automatization of the tag had changed that.
If we need to have a new tag for it, source mismatch sounds like it would work perfectly fine, especially given what NNT noted.
Okay, I've switched all of my edits over.
I believe "This tag is maintained automatically and cannot be manually added directly." is wrong. That should only be the case when the source in question is a known site. Testing it on post #3248150 (a sourceless post) and post #5224724 (an FC2 source) confirms this, though ironically I couldn't remove the tag from the latter without first removing the source (and it gets re-added when I try to put the source back).
When bad source started being auto-added to posts there was no job ran to populate it, so some old posts which should have the tag currently do not and have to be manually edited for the tag list to be updated. That might be what you ran into for the latter.
Well, from what I can tell, post #5224724 is not a bad source.
It is according to Danbooru, I verified in the console. That might be a bug.
Damian0358 said:
I believe "This tag is maintained automatically and cannot be manually added directly." is wrong. That should only be the case when the source in question is a known site. Testing it on post #3248150 (a sourceless post) and post #5224724 (an FC2 source) confirms this, though ironically I couldn't remove the tag from the latter without first removing the source (and it gets re-added when I try to put the source back).
Added pull #5170 to fix this.
