imply exif_rotation -> rotated

Posted under Tags

I understand. Maybe creating the lossy_rotation tag would help differentiate between the two? Then implicating both lossy_rotation and exif_rotation to rotated.

Edit: This is overcomplicated and wouldn't do much. I've come to the conclusion that exif_rotation and rotated are best left separate as said above, since exif_rotation is changing a simple value in the metadata, and rotated is re-encoding the image.

Updated by user 903640

1