Placeholder1996 said:
Looks like it to me. There’s some weird stuff going on with Fern’s bangs. Edit: You can also see it in Frieren’s eyebrows and bow on her dress.
I mean, there's 6 fingers, lol.
Posted under General
post #9551988
The jacket looks off.
sycer13 said:
post #9551988
The jacket looks off.
The pockets look kinda weird but those sherrif star things on the left side of the jacket look horrendous. The shirt buttons also are all over the place, and the skirt belt forgot that it needs to actually be a belt (it's just a floating buckle lol). Also the straps left and right of the buckle are weird. This post definitely looks like AI, and looking at the other posts on their Pixiv, it doesn't look much better there...
Placeholder1996 said:
jmx (j m x) I posted a number of works from this artist yesterday, but I just saw one of their other posts was flagged for AI and deleted. I've since taken a closer look at their active posts and I have some concerns, but I could use a second opinion.
I am convinced now that this an AI-prompter.
post #8987758 The hair over the shoulders, especially to the right side (our right). The legs are also shaped strangely.
post #9549636 The collarbone on our left side, the chain for her purse, and the detail work of the jeans. The hair may be a little iffy too.
post #9550091 The chain on her shorts.
These are just three posts, there's probably more in the others; I just haven't looked closely yet. I'm fully prepared to pull the trigger on flagging their entire collection here, I just wanted to post this first to see if anyone else wanted to say something.
Placeholder1996 said:
I am convinced now that this an AI-prompter.
post #8987758 The hair over the shoulders, especially to the right side (our right). The legs are also shaped strangely.
post #9549636 The collarbone on our left side, the chain for her purse, and the detail work of the jeans. The hair may be a little iffy too.
post #9550091 The chain on her shorts.These are just three posts, there's probably more in the others; I just haven't looked closely yet. I'm fully prepared to pull the trigger on flagging their entire collection here, I just wanted to post this first to see if anyone else wanted to say something.
In the Artist's commentary of post #8987758, they said it was created based on the work of dax_ai. And dax_ai directly put "ai" in their username.
eromelon said:
In the Artist's commentary of post #8987758, they said it was created based on the work of dax_ai. And dax_ai directly put "ai" in their username.
So, AI-generated that's been touched up by a human artist then? In that case, it could be legal
is this ai? post #7351779 she has 6 toes.
Is it AI generated?
asset #27514743
asset #27514721
I wanna know if quilm is AI assisted. I've seen their WIPs on their twitter, but some of the posts seem sus.
post #9352743 has the necklace being so incomprehensible and there seem to be strands of hair present in the left collar.
post #9326793 has tassels that seemingly came out of nowhere from the clothes.
post #9322292 on the right side hand has strands of hair that seem cut off and the details of the stocking (the three dots pattern) seem a bit off.
But they seem to have pretty solid portfolio prior generative AI though, so I think maybe they just didn't want to bother with these details.
siraco said:
I wanna know if quilm is AI assisted. I've seen their WIPs on their twitter, but some of the posts seem sus.
post #9352743 has the necklace being so incomprehensible and there seem to be strands of hair present in the left collar.
post #9326793 has tassels that seemingly came out of nowhere from the clothes.
post #9322292 on the right side hand has strands of hair that seem cut off and the details of the stocking (the three dots pattern) seem a bit off.
But they seem to have pretty solid portfolio prior generative AI though, so I think maybe they just didn't want to bother with these details.
The design of post #9326793 probably comes from post #8337919. And their preference for a straight torso and similar standing poses seems to be consistent even though the artist's art style changes. Perhaps the artist is simply not good at it/doesn't care about the details.
Updated by eromelon
NSFW, post #9563858 and post #9561042
ai-tracker said:
is this ai? post #7351779 she has 6 toes.
Given the toes are barely visible shading lines on a sock I really don't think that says much.
As for TwistedScarlett themself I've occasionally wondered the same thing. They did briefly experiment with AI in 2022, but it was very transparent (and looked nothing like their usual work) and their art style seems too consistent to be primarily generated either way, IMO - it has been for a good couple of years. Doesn't usually have any noticeable artifacts, either. (It's also worth noting their style gets nabbed for LORAs pretty often.)
Could they be incorporating AI? Maybe, and I wouldn't be shocked, but if they are it's definitely just AI-assisted. There's no definitive proof to say so, though.
(I do think they use AI backgrounds tbh.)
Updated by Confetto
reg_panda said:
This one? No, not even close.
Confetto said:
Given the toes are barely visible shading lines on a sock I really don't think that says much.
As for TwistedScarlett themself I've occasionally wondered the same thing. They did briefly experiment with AI in 2022, but it was very transparent (and looked nothing like their usual work) and their art style seems too consistent to be primarily generated either way, IMO - it has been for a good couple of years. Doesn't usually have any noticeable artifacts, either. (It's also worth noting their style gets nabbed for LORAs pretty often.)
Could they be incorporating AI? Maybe, and I wouldn't be shocked, but if they are it's definitely just AI-assisted. There's no definitive proof to say so, though.
(I do think they use AI backgrounds tbh.)
They also use AI for their h-games, and "replaced" some assets with traced versions of the old AI, so it's far from outside the realm of possibility that they just do it with all of their work now.
thoughts? post #9565557 post #9564325
all his work has those dead eyes that ai has, plus the lightning looks like it's ai.
ai-tracker said:
thoughts? post #9565557 post #9564325
all his work has those dead eyes that ai has, plus the lightning looks like it's ai.
Looking at the artist’s other works, they’ve had the same style for a number of years now. I don’t see any of the errors stereotypical of AI art, even in works a couple of years old. It could be ai-assisted, but that’s legal as far as the site’s concerned.
I found a new artist on pixiv, and I'm a little concerned and confused. They started posting art three months ago and it's of high quality; this combined with a relatively high post frequency makes me think it might be AI. However, inspecting the art reveals nothing overly suspicious; none of the trademark AI errors are present, at least not on first glance. I could use additional pairs of eyes for this one. Warning: Artist posts a lot of very NSFW art.
Placeholder1996 said:
I found a new artist on pixiv, and I'm a little concerned and confused. They started posting art three months ago and it's of high quality; this combined with a relatively high post frequency makes me think it might be AI. However, inspecting the art reveals nothing overly suspicious; none of the trademark AI errors are present, at least not on first glance. I could use additional pairs of eyes for this one. Warning: Artist posts a lot of very NSFW art.
I think It's AI. pixiv #131849217 has weird garbled eyes, the chain also looks incredibly messy in a way that makes no sense for a real artist. The gag also changes colors in a very AI way. pixiv #132188454 Why are some of the speech bubbles smooth while the others are aliased? Also Fern's hair ornament keeps changing and doesn't look correct. pixiv #129366059 The girl's eyes change colors between all of the images, purple at first then green then purple but heterochromatic at the end.