The bulk update request #14581 has been rejected.
create implication spruce -> conifer
Because spruce is a species of coniferous evergreen tree. Feel free to change this BUR.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #14581 has been rejected.
create implication spruce -> conifer
Because spruce is a species of coniferous evergreen tree. Feel free to change this BUR.
The bulk update request #14582 has been rejected.
create implication pine_tree -> conifer
This one too.
KagayakuShiningGate said:
The bulk update request #14582 has been rejected.
Why would they disagree? In context of illustrations, both spruce and pine trees look too identical each other. And it's not easy to distinguish at glance. So implying both with conifer would make sense IMHO.
Updated
Are we sure we want to have an umbrella tag that contains christmas trees and random-ass pine forests?
Someone tagged some generic-looking evergreen trees with spruce in post #5972520. It's padding.
nonamethanks said:
Are we sure we want to have an umbrella tag that contains christmas trees and random-ass pine forests?
ion288 said:
Tree names are a mess IRL, the old traditional names conflict with old scientific latin names and with new gene based research.
I frankly cant tell the difference between whats tagged as spruce and pine on Danbooru. Aliasing all to conifer might be the best opiton.
I can change my mind. Those trees look similar each other. Would you prefer a better aliasing into a more general category like this?
alias pine tree -> conifer
alias spruce -> conifer
The bulk update request #14581 (forum #231037) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #14582 (forum #231038) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.