Nuke sleeveless_turtleneck_leotard or make it imply its component tags

BUR #15406 has been rejected.

mass update sleeveless_turtleneck_leotard -> sleeveless
mass update sleeveless_turtleneck_leotard -> turtleneck_leotard
nuke sleeveless_turtleneck_leotard

It's a wikiless composite tag, and the lack of implications causes a lot of missing sleeveless and turtleneck leotard (and also leotard, since the even when people manually tag with turtleneck leotard it doesn't imply leotard, but that's its own BUR).

BUR #15407 has been rejected.

create implication sleeveless_turtleneck_leotard -> sleeveless
create implication sleeveless_turtleneck_leotard -> turtleneck_leotard

Alternatively, if people want to keep it at least have it imply its component tags to reduce mistags.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #15406 (forum #234512) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #15407 (forum #234513) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

We also have sleeveless_turtleneck. This means that in theory sleeveless turtleneck leotard would have to imply sleeveless turtleneck and turtleneck_leotard.

The votes are pretty split, and I'm not sure myself what to do honestly, gonna have to defer to @evazion's opinion.

apparently there's sleeveless turtleneck dress too, i'd change my vote if i could because i think at best, only sleeveless_turtleneck should be kept