"no_shirt" tag redundant and useless for males?

If we look at it, "wearing everything but a shirt" is pretty vague and subjective: when do we judge a shirt could have been wear in the occasion?

And most importantly, there is already something else better to "cover" the situation : for female there are several layers of undressing, but for a male, there is no reason we're not directly on bare_pectorals. I see it's often ambiguous between the two, especially with things like capes.

The last situation it could work with is if it's almost topless_male, but in fact the pectorals themselves are still strategically hidden somehow (like bra does for girls)

What about wearing a jacket with no shirt underneath, such as post #6163906? Or a vest with no shirt, such as post #5476789? Topless means fully topless, so it wouldn't apply to those, but they also aren't bare pectorals either.

Yes with the bra that's the case it should work with, but with what I saw there seems to be several miss-tagging with bare_pectorals. As no_shirt englobate several types of pictures I can't easily filter it with only 2.