BUR #26126 is pending approval.
create implication crescent_hair_ornament -> crescent_ornament
create implication crescent_hat_ornament -> crescent_ornament
create implication leaf_hair_ornament -> leaf_ornament
create implication leaf_hat_ornament -> leaf_ornament
create implication skull_hair_ornament -> skull_ornament
create implication skull_hat_ornament -> skull_ornament
I think it is incredibly frustrating that we often have hat and hair ornament tags but not a base *_ornament. If it is say a tail ornament or a wing ornament there if no easy way to tag it, and in such cases it is often not worth creating a single image tag for an ornament location that is mostly likely not common. For such cases you should just be able to tag that such a shaped ornament exists in the image.
I've gotten mixed-reception to this so here's a few where the implication would go through for voting purposes. Worth noting that some of these do have more generalized tags already such as skull ornament or anchor ornament. If these implications are "padding tags" should those be deprecated in favor of forcing more specific tagging?
At this point I am just making a post to gauge opinions on the matter.