xx*_threesome implies multiple_x

Posted under Tags

BUR #43033 has been rejected.

create implication mmf_threesome -> multiple_boys
create implication mmm_threesome -> multiple_boys
create implication ffm_threesome -> multiple_girls
create implication fff_threesome -> multiple_girls

I've seen a few instances of posts tagged with one of the threesome tags above but not with appropriated Nboys/Ngirls tags. While we cannot create an implication for the direct number (e.g. xxy_threesome does not imply 2x 1y, there might be bystanders), we can safely imply multiple_x.

I realize these aren't "necessary" if posts are tagged properly, but that applies to every implication :)

Full disclosure: I'm proposing these to reduce cases where my blacklists fail due to incomplete tagging.

Uh, sorry, I don't get it. The mmf_threesome tag wiki specifically says it is for a threesome between 2 boys and 1 girl. Is the tag being incorrectly used for 1 girl 2 non-human, or does the wiki needs to be updated? Or I am missing the point entirely?

You don't have to take wikis like that to the letter. These tags can apply to bestiality, but it's likely that whoever wrote the definition didn't think about it simply because people tend to not want to think about bestiality.

I wouldn't even update the wikis unless we want to remind everyone checking these tags of the existence of bestiality every time they look at the wiki.

So the answer is the wiki is incorrect and will not be corrected, and we should keep quiet about it?

I realized I can just blacklist the threesome tag itself instead of relying on the implication. But to add my $ 0.02, that sounds intractable. I would either split the tags so there is a separated version for bestiality (does the current tag make sense? I'm not disabling my blacklist to check...) or at least give a generic warning on the wiki about broader usage or something.

1