Overwatch Implications

BUR #44984 has been rejected.

create implication overwatch_1 -> overwatch
create implication overwatch_2 -> overwatch
create implication overwatch_apex -> overwatch

Obvious tagging is obvious lol, as for Apex it's the precursor to League so the Wiki tells me and League's implied so it should be too.

forum #335494

Check if a tag's deprecated before creating a BUR perhaps?

Ylimegirl said:

Check if a tag's deprecated before creating a BUR perhaps?

Never dealt with deprecations before, As the tag still exists I figured it should be implied.

If a tag is deprecated it means it should eventually be manually nuked once replacement tags are added. Deprecation also automatically removes existing implications and aliases iirc. The tag still exists but eventually it should be gardened away. As I think was explained to you once on your old account aliases and implications for empty (nuked) tags get auto-retired on a weekly basis, so this implication would eventually get retired anyways.

Iseseith said:

Never dealt with deprecations before, As the tag still exists I figured it should be implied.

No it needs to be emptied, right now the only reason it isn't is so people can make costume tags which you can do if you're familiar with the game. I personally think since nobody seems to care about that it should just be nuked.

The bulk update request #44984 (forum #374272) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

Ylimegirl said:

If a tag is deprecated it means it should eventually be manually nuked once replacement tags are added. Deprecation also automatically removes existing implications and aliases iirc. The tag still exists but eventually it should be gardened away. As I think was explained to you once on your old account aliases and implications for empty (nuked) tags get auto-retired on a weekly basis, so this implication would eventually get retired anyways.

In that case it was me trying to imply a game before it had any art, not the same thing.

Iseseith said:

In that case it was me trying to imply a game before it had any art, not the same thing.

It may not be identical, but if you can't understand the through-line between the two scenarios of "a tag that is currently empty" and "a tag that is eventually intended to be empty" I think you might just have a chronic case of failing to get the point.

also said game still doesn't have any art 3 months later, fwiw.

BUR #44987 is pending approval.

nuke overwatch_1
nuke overwatch_2

I don't really see a reason to keep these around, especially since there isn't really much to clean up copyright wise. That alone is enough to nuke in favor of the typical Overwatch tag. Idk about Apex though, as I was just observing this discussion and would rather someone actually familiar with the series weigh in on that one.

Well, if the reason for deprecation was related to costumes...Well, I guess this BUR can serve as a time limit for that? I always work better with time limits, and it seems the site agrees given what happened when Evazion did something similar with the old legwear tags.