floral print panties implies print panties and floral_print

BUR #46926 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication floral_print_panties -> print_panties
create implication floral_print_panties -> floral_print

Missing implications

Are there any cases of this that would not just fall under lingerie? I'm a bit skeptical mainly because the only articles of clothing that get a full print tag like this are dresses, skirts and kimonos rather than just expecting the article of clothing plus the print tag.

WRS said:

Are there any cases of this that would not just fall under lingerie? I'm a bit skeptical mainly because the only articles of clothing that get a full print tag like this are dresses, skirts and kimonos rather than just expecting the article of clothing plus the print tag.

Images like post #9760226 and post #9583734 would not fall under lingerie based on that tag's wiki.

Fair point, plain print evaded me.

The bulk update request #46926 (forum #385012) has been approved by @evazion.

If things like post #9126955 count as floral print then most of lace panties is going to count as floral print.