imply ponytail_with_braided_base -> ponytail

BUR #47622 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication ponytail_with_braided_base -> ponytail

Self explanatory.

ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail begs to differ. Then again, I'd prefer it split anyways.

BUR #47636 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail solo -> -ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail_with_braided_base
mass update favgroup:42004 -> -ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail_with_braided_base
create implication side_ponytail_with_braided_base -> side_ponytail
create implication side_ponytail_with_braided_base -> braid

This is to create sidetail with braided base side ponytail with braided base so we can safely imply ponytail with braided base to ponytail.

hasu_no_tokimeki said:

BUR #47636 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail solo -> -ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail_with_braided_base
mass update favgroup:42004 -> -ponytail_with_braided_base side_ponytail_with_braided_base
create implication side_ponytail_with_braided_base -> side_ponytail
create implication side_ponytail_with_braided_base -> braid

This is to create sidetail with braided base so we can safely imply ponytail with braided base to ponytail.

I agree, except should it be side_ponytail_with_braided_base to match the base tag?

Placeholder1996 said:

I agree, except should it be side_ponytail_with_braided_base to match the base tag?

There is short sidetail, but there's also high side ponytail and low side ponytail. Changing it.

The bulk update request #47636 (forum #387264) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #47636 (forum #387264) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #47622 (forum #387232) has been approved by @evazion.