Jewelry Implications

BUR #48800 has been rejected.

create implication silver_necklace -> necklace
create implication silver_armlet -> armlet
create implication silver_thighlet -> thighlet
create implication silver_anklet -> anklet
create implication silver_belt -> belt
create implication gold_armlet -> armlet
create implication gold_thighlet -> thighlet
create implication gold_anklet -> anklet
create implication gold_belt -> belt
create implication bone_necklace -> necklace
create implication crystal_necklace -> necklace
create implication glowing_necklace -> necklace

Possibly some missing implications.

Bone necklace and crystal necklace have the same problem as in topic #33425 where it's usually a bone pendant hanging from a necklace (but which could also be attached to a choker or collar), rather than the necklace chain itself being made out of bones. There's also a lot of cases where bone necklace is used when it's more of a tooth necklace.

BUR #48945 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication silver_necklace -> necklace
create implication silver_armlet -> armlet
create implication silver_thighlet -> thighlet
create implication silver_anklet -> anklet
create implication silver_belt -> belt
create implication gold_armlet -> armlet
create implication gold_thighlet -> thighlet
create implication gold_anklet -> anklet
create implication gold_belt -> belt

I'll do these for now.

The bulk update request #48945 (forum #391824) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #48800 (forum #391304) has been rejected by @evazion.

evazion said:

Bone necklace and crystal necklace have the same problem as in topic #33425 where it's usually a bone pendant hanging from a necklace (but which could also be attached to a choker or collar), rather than the necklace chain itself being made out of bones. There's also a lot of cases where bone necklace is used when it's more of a tooth necklace.

Do we need tags like crystal_pendant and then alias the imprecise *_necklace tags to them?