BUR #49881 has been rejected.
create implication iridescent_hair -> iridescent
Add implication for iridescent when tagging iridescent_hair.
If iridescent_hair is too similar to rainbow hair or multicolored hair, then let's nuke it instead
Posted under Tags
BUR #49881 has been rejected.
create implication iridescent_hair -> iridescent
Add implication for iridescent when tagging iridescent_hair.
If iridescent_hair is too similar to rainbow hair or multicolored hair, then let's nuke it instead
Iridescent would include iridescent hair, iridescent clothes, and everything else. We've moved away from umbrella tags like that because they're too broad and include too many disparate things (see: shiny, striped, etc).
The bulk update request #49881 (forum #395488) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
We need to deprecate iridescent but there's a lot of things that could be iridescent. We'll probably need tags like iridescent object, iridescent surface etc... The other day I was driving home and saw iridescence on a stop sign of all things.
