Frivolous neg or not?

http://danbooru.donmai.us/user_record/index?user_id=14738

Gee, I can't help that I can't read japanese. And I don't trust automated translations to give correct info.
At least I post the source so someone else can put proper info.

Unless of course you want me to post the artist's name in japanese.

Dalamar said:
Gee, I can't help that I can't read japanese. And I don't trust automated translations to give correct info. At least I post the source so someone else can put proper info.

If you don't trust machine translations, there's forum #39382.

Plus, an incorrect artist tag can be fixed later, and it's certainly much better than nothing.

I'd say that using a translator is your best bet. I can't read Japanese either, but that doesn't stop me.

Guess I'll just use their account name next time. Probably end up with loads of bad tags. Oh well.

You don't have to be able to read japanese in every instance. For example, your two most recent uploads from pixiv had images previously uploaded to danbooru by their respective artists, already tagged with an artist, and easily findable using a source:*/pu-co/* and source:*/64746347/* search.

If you don't know where I pulled those from, they are from the image source when copied on pixiv.

I guess giving you a warning first by PM would have been preferable, as it would have provided you the chance to ask how you could do it without knowing japanese.

Isn't this like the fourth time a neg by cyberia has come into question? At least one was purged by albert can't recall what the others were.

Dalamar said:
Guess I'll just use their account name next time. Probably end up with loads of bad tags. Oh well.

Use forum #39382. That's why it's there.

That negative is a bit harsh seeing it was given after only 1 under-tagged image, the reason could have very well been carelessness from the poster and not intentional.

rantuyetmai said:
That negative is a bit harsh seeing it was given after only 1 under-tagged image, the reason could have very well been carelessness from the poster and not intentional.

Well, according to the OP it was clearly intentional.

It is a bit harsh and unfair if he was never pm'd about it though.

Related: forum #23943.

He never pmed me. No one has complained about my tagging before in fact.

Removed the neg. At any rate, now you know.

Fred1515 said:
Well, according to the OP it was clearly intentional.

Just making example on the situation.

Dalamar said:
No one has complained about my tagging before in fact.

I do get annoyed a lot at people who doesn't tag enough, seeing the mass of pics to find. But usually I pm the poster first (about tag and source).

Dalamar > I apologize for making wrong assumptions and not contacting you via PM first.
Seeing that you used to tag artists on your earlier pixiv uploads but didn't tag any of the recent ones lead me to think it was laziness, especially since find artist or source searches would have worked, and attending the forum should have made you aware of the artist tagging help sticky. I was going to PM you until I saw that you did tag your older uploads.
Anyway I was still wrong in the end so sorry again.

Log said:
Isn't this like the fourth time a neg by cyberia has come into question? At least one was purged by albert can't recall what the others were.

Given that my total of records given including this one is 3 (2+ 1-) and that I had never used the record feature before this month it certainly isn't me. If you're mistaking me with someone else right after forum #46745 I'd like you to stop.

What does a post that has absolutely nothing to do with you have to do with this thread or anything else?

There's like 5 people with hyphens in their names who actively do dumb shit, whoops.

That's two derogatory remarks coming right out of nowhere in two days while your posts have always been fine as far as I can tell, so allow me to be a little surprised.
(And yeah I feel partly targeted by that other post.)

That wasn't derogatory and I guarantee I'm not the only one who feels that way about a thread like that.

I would have posted that as the very first response because I saw the thread go up but I was going to allow people to find alternative ideas before shooting down the original one.

When did people start freaking out about every little thing?

e: freaking out is more appropriate.