Tag Alias: missing_eye -> one-eyed

Tag Alias: missing_eye -> one-eyed

reason: missing_eye is already covered by one-eyed.

I think it would be better to split the one-eyed tag, and have a division between single eyed beings and beings that have a natural pair but have lost an eye. The concepts and their visuals are different, so it seems somewhat odd to be placing them both under the same tag.

Eh, sounds good to me.
What about pictures where one of the characters eyes isn't drawn, but they don't actually have only one eye? ex: post #1018819 and post #823445

Probably not the best examples. The first one is missing more than just an eye, and the second is just shaded face.

Either way, its entirely different than missing eye and one-eyed.

What if you're tagging something with more than two eyes and it's missing one?

A missing eye is a missing eye, it shouldn't matter how many there are supposed to be.

Reese's point is that something with a third eye that has one missing eye is not one-eyed (it still has two), so the alias doesn't work nor would an implication.

As for DanteSeriphs examples, I'd think that a case where there is hair_over_one_eye or one eye is undrawn or shaded from the image would not be an appropriate case for either missing eye nor one-eyed.

Thank you Shinjidude, that's the point I was getting at. Sorry for not being more clear.