I think so too, but I prefer to hear the opinion of the rest before doing anything.
If they're okay with figurines pics, I'll approve it.
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
I don't approve photos, figure or cosplay or otherwise. I don't approve real porn because it's out of scope, but figures and cosplay are personal preference (or lack thereof for them). Danbooru just doesn't seem like a place for photography for me, but I don't really have much of a problem with figures I guess. And cosplay/figures arent explicitly against the rules.
post #354798 - just tried to upload this and found it's already here but it expired. I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs... it collected quite a few favorites too.
piespy said:
post #354798 - just tried to upload this and found it's already here but it expired. I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs... it collected quite a few favorites too.
While the breasts are a bit of a blasphemy the only main problem was the skin coloring seemed a bit weird. It's not that bad though so I undeleted it.
piespy said:
post #354798 - just tried to upload this and found it's already here but it expired. I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs... it collected quite a few favorites too.
The art is just not so good, and the coloring is awful. I wouldn't have approved that picture.
What is it about post #360257 and post #360259 that made them worth keeping when post #360256 and post #360253 weren't? I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely want to know because they seem equivalent at a glance. It's not an appeal per se because I don't care if they come back or not, my reason for asking is that hopefully knowing the reasoning behind it will help me in the future.
Also, for the scope of this topic, post #360045 and post #360054 .
salarta said:
What is it about post #360257 and post #360259 that made them worth keeping when post #360256 and post #360253 weren't?
For one, the unapproved ones look like cropped versions of bigger pictures.
Kayako said:
For one, the unapproved ones look like cropped versions of bigger pictures.
If they are, then the artist never added the uncropped versions to their site. I found all four images in the same area and same time frame. They're the same sizes only the width and height are reversed, literally the exact same numbers (270 x 400 for Ritsuko, 400 x 270 for Misato).
post #360324
post #360327
post #360331
post #360330
post #358743
post #354961
post #329658
post #324528
post #309512
post #303246
post #266668
post #353550
post #353548
post #295257
can these be appealed? All of this posts are from artist who already have similar posts approved
It seems to me that post #352766 may have been overlooked, as several other images of similar quality by the same artist (such as post #352767) have been approved, and I don't think they violate any of the upload guidelines.
The art's pretty good, and really, there's _plenty_ of equally disturbing things on danbooru already (post #344597 comes to mind). I don't think things should be deleted just because they're too weird; honestly, going to these sorts of bizarre extremes is part of what hentai is about.
I say it falls firmly under a TOS violation:
"Grotesque: Any depiction of extreme mutilation, extreme bodily distension, feces, or bodies that are far outside the realm of normal human proportion (for example, breasts that are as large as the body)."
Three dicks as big each as her torso + dicknipples = grotesque. The fact that there's other crap like it on danbooru doesn't mean we need more, and I'd already have nuked the existing stuff if I could.