sonic tags

Are there really no Robotnik Pictures in the whole Danbooru? i have tried Robotnik Dr_Robotnik Ivo_robotnik Dr_ivo_robotnik drrobotnik, and none worked

Apparently it's dr._eggman. One you can't even see him, and one is a genderswap.

So, seems like no =P

Still bugs me the small amount of pics about sonic the hedhegog. 12 pics seems like WAY too little pics. There are also no pics on the Amy_rose tag. It seems like there is a problem there.

it seems like there had been an anti-furry cleansing

I know a solution: upload some freakin' Sonic/Dr. Eggman/Amy pics. Hell, I'll even personally approve them if they're good. I'm the biggest Sonic fan you'll find this side of a 32X.

Already working on lurking for them!

Edit: Just for the record, are the "ore no natsu" and "furry bomb" series DNP? I just cant find if there is a DNP list.

kowaiser said: Already working on lurking for them!

As noted, as long as it's not furry.

jxh2154 said:
As noted, as long as it's not furry.

It's a bit difficult as the characters are echidnas, hedhegogs, rabbits, cats, foxes and such, but i already found a pair of doujins that are sonic related, are NOT furry and there is no one claiming profit from those.

There are also some pics that are confusing because are not fully furry but doesn´t qualify as completly human like http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/f7deb9373b.jpg

As long as it's not ero furry it will be approved.

kowaiser said: There are also some pics that are confusing because are not fully furry but doesn´t qualify as completly human like http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/f7deb9373b.jpg

I'd kill it with fire given half the chance... but at any rate, yes by "furry" it's meant something sexual. The mere presence of sonic and pals in a piece of art does not render the image "furry" in the sense meant here.

jxh2154 said:
I'd kill it with fire given half the chance... but at any rate, yes by "furry" it's meant something sexual. The mere presence of sonic and pals in a piece of art does not render the image "furry" in the sense meant here.

Then lets try to be a bit more clear with this then. The pic that i put under Freeimagehosting.net is considered furry or not? I would use common sense, but it doesn´t apply to the interwebz. Sometimes Rouge seems as furry as morrigan (darkstalkers) can be and for that matter, i never saw anyone complaining about Felicia (darkstalkers) or Katt (Breath of fire) as they both have a great portion of body fur. Also There is a "Bestiality" tag that implies sex with animals. That means that mods reject pics of sex with people with animal caracteristics, but allow pics of sex with full-being animals?

There are also sonic pics that Screams "sexBETWEENfoxANDhedgehog" (asuming amy is a cat or whatever) but the only fur visible in Amy is in her head. See http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/5c8175689d.jpg
This are the pics that makes me wonder if upload or not as they are pretty confusing.

Boy, I'm glad I edited in that "if they're good" clause.

Okey, uploading:
post #257005
as i told, These are NOT furry. not furrier than your average neko.

kowaiser said: Okey, uploading:\npost #257005\nas i told, These are NOT furry. not furrier than your average neko.

That one is okay, I guess. Creepy, but okay if I try not to think about who it is. Tails fucking the frightening pink thing, not so much.

also, I have to add about the tag confusion: Some people start tagging as tails pics with more than one tail on it. I suggest using Tails as an alias for miles_prower and Tail for any picture of people with tails, including multiple tails like kitsunes.