Danbooru

tag bodypainted "clothes"?

Posted under General

Hillside_Moose said:

While it's technically nude, I would still want the simulated "clothes" to be tagged so that different kinds of painted clothes can be found. If someone is particularly anal about paint showing up in their search, it's an easy negation of painted_clothes.

I agree with this. I would think "bodypaint that looks like <x> item of clothes" should be tagged both "painted_clothes" and "<x>," under the same logic by which we tag a picture of Character A cosplaying as Character B with both the "Character A" and "Character B" tags. They are both being depicted, even if only one is "real" in the context of the image.

On a related note, should post #950849 be tagged futanari? The artist tagged it as such but that tag was removed by someone and another user later added "trap", which seems to be totally incorrect.
If we go by "tag what is painted on" and "tag what the artist says" then it should definitely be futanari.

jjj14 said:

On a related note, should post #950849 be tagged futanari? The artist tagged it as such but that tag was removed by someone and another user later added "trap", which seems to be totally incorrect.
If we go by "tag what is painted on" and "tag what the artist says" then it should definitely be futanari.

I'd say it definitely demonstrates what jxh2154 said above about "depending on the quality of the paint job"; it took me a number of tries to realize what I was looking at. (It doesn't look like a male with a futanari painted on his body; it looks like an image of a male that's been made transparent in places so as to show a female/futa image on a lower layer.) Questions of quality aside, though, yeah, I'd say that logic and precedent say it should be tagged futanari.

1