It's tagged with muscle, and yet, it's one of the more feminine Yuugis I remeber seeing. WTF happened with the whole "tags are objective, pools are subjective" thing?
The only thing that's clear about this image is that she is depicted MORE muscular than in any canon appearance, and even more muscular than on average in fanon, therefore not meeting the pool's criteria of a "feminine, not overly muscular Yuugi", which implies that Yuugi is less often depicted as "feminine" than other characters.
Is the pool's concept good? Hell no, but unless it is discussed and changed, that's how it is.
S1eth said: The only thing that's clear about this image is that she is depicted MORE muscular than in any canon appearance, and even more muscular than on average in fanon, therefore not meeting the pool's criteria of a "feminine, not overly muscular Yuugi", which implies that Yuugi is less often depicted as "feminine" than other characters.
Is the pool's concept good? Hell not, but unless it is discussed and changed, that's how it is.
Well, she's being very girly in this pic, and as you said, she must not be OVERLY muscular, she just have a bit of muscle
There's no danbooru definition for either "feminine" nor "girly", but I can assure you that they are not the same.
Either way, why would you think that an image of a character being girly is in any way special enough to require a pool IF AND ONLY IF the character happens to be Yuugi? I could add every Yuugi image of her "not being overly muscular" to this pool to show you what I mean, but this would be both a waste of time and possibly vandalism. (96% = 177 pages of Yuugi) Instead, just do a hoshiguma_yuugi search and pretend that all those images were pooled. (you can skip the comics and ponies)
S1eth said: The only thing that's clear about this image is that she is depicted MORE muscular than in any canon appearance, and even more muscular than on average in fanon
she really doesn't seem all that muscular. her left arm kind of looks weird, but i wouldn't call her "more muscular than on average fanon". post #1130531 on the other hand...