Wow...don't want to be in that turret. Be rather cramped with all of those guns and the breaches inside taking the space inside.

So... who the hell removed a battleship's turret and jammed it in the tank?

I can only imagine the ammo supply problems this tank has. Also precision aiming. And heaven forbid if they take a direct hit and it cooks off some ammo.

Being in the turret might be bad, but I'd rather be in it than in front of it.

I think only Hitler or Stalin would like this kind of monstrosity

MajorAmiruddin said:

I think only Hitler or Stalin would like this kind of monstrosity

hitler maybe but stalin prefer light and faster tanks like the stalin tank.

Horrible idea to have an entire battery on one vehicle. If it gets hit, you just lost a whole lot of fire power.

Eevee13Fox said:

Horrible idea to have an entire battery on one vehicle. If it gets hit, you just lost a whole lot of fire power.

Ever seen a Ratte?

I think this... thing can shoot and all, but I don't think it supposed to shoot all cannons at once. That would be quite a wounding recoil, up to jamming turret's bearring, tread shredding and even capsizing, depending on tank's and turret's position.
Then, there's always exist concepts if uninhabitable turrets.

Just from looking at it, I feel it would be more useful as an armored artillery piece rather than a tank, just look at that elevation on the guns and oversized optics! What's more look at the sniper rifles they are all carrying, clearly they are planning a long-range engagement.

Nice picture mars expedition is always facinating.