cd young about 7 years ago [hidden] if it's a good quality image, it's a goo quality image, being off topic is irrelevant. -2 Reply Copy ID Copy Link
wet ass pussy about 7 years ago [hidden] Is a caveat really needed in the flag reason?cd_young said:if it's a good quality image, it's a goo quality image, being off topic is irrelevant.Actually it's how goo the quality is that's irreverent. High res photos of waterfalls are also good quality, want to start uploading some of them now? 1 Reply Copy ID Copy Link
user 509825 about 7 years ago [hidden] chinatsu_(sweetpea) said:Is a caveat really needed in the flag reason?Actually it's how goo the quality is that's irreverent. High res photos of waterfalls are also good quality, want to start uploading some of them now?Maybe not photos, but what's with drawings >:3? 0 Reply Copy ID Copy Link
wet ass pussy about 7 years ago [hidden] Toskana said:Maybe not photos, but what's with drawings >:3?I said photo for a reason. I think illustrated waterfalls are in the same class as landscapes and help to similar standards. 0 Reply Copy ID Copy Link
iridescent slime about 7 years ago [hidden] cd_young said:if it's a good quality image, it's a goo quality image, being off topic is irrelevant.You cannot possibly be serious. "Off topic" is literally the first reason listed under the flagging dialog. 0 Reply Copy ID Copy Link