60

25

15.

16

Are we assuming that TwoBirds is the double of OneBird here? Because I don't see how this system implies such other than by visual representation of the variables, which should have no mathematical weight.

WingedIkaros said:

Are we assuming that TwoBirds is the double of OneBird here? Because I don't see how this system implies such other than by visual representation of the variables, which should have no mathematical weight.

Oh, did not notice that, I guess that is the case

[deleted]

darue said:

15.

The first three lines can be expressed as the coefficient matrix A = [3 0 0; 1 2 0; 0 1 2] with constant terms B = [30; 20; 9].

Solving Ax = B for solution vector x yields:

x = [10; 5; 2]

The bottom line asks us to solve for n = x(2) + (x(3)/2)*x(1).

Solving using the definition of x above yields:

n = 5 + (2/2)*10

n = 15

ok... mind is blown

= 5 + 10x
indeterminate because we have 4 unknowns but only 3 equations.

The answers are 5 ± 10√2. Because multiplication is the default when you don't specify the operator.

[deleted]

Paz_Legalces said:

Wait a sec... why the heck everyone here giving fancy advanced maths solution, when this is just a usual equation meme popularly seen on Facebook?

3BearMokou=30
BearMokou=10

10+2HeadMokou=20
2HeadMokou=10
HeadMokou=5

5+2Chicks+2Chicks=9
4chicks=4
Chick=1

HeadMokou+Chick+BearMokou =>10+5+1
Final answer: 16

Be aware that the math sign in the last row is a "*" and not a "+".
So the last row is 5 + (1*10) = 15.

Wait a sec... why the heck everyone here giving fancy advanced mathematics solution, when this is just the usual Equation Meme commonly seen on Facebook?

3BearMokou=30
BearMokou=10

10+2HeadMokou=20
2HeadMokou=10
HeadMokou=5

5+2Chicks+2Chicks=9
4chicks=4
Chick=1

HeadMokou+Chick*BearMokou =>10+5*1 => 15

provence said:

Be aware that the math sign in the last row is a "*" and not a "+".
So the last row is 5 + (1*10) = 15.

Dammit, noticed that error and deleted my previous comment in less than 20 seconds ago, but it was a tad late it seem

Paz_Legalces said:

Wait a sec... why the heck everyone here giving fancy advanced mathematics solution, when this is just the usual Equation Meme commonly seen on Facebook?

Coefficient matrix solution is just a fancy (and compact, at least on paper) way to solve multiple equations; math is actually exactly the same to what you described - notice how vector x has the same values as your variables :3

19.1421356237...
My reasoning: In the one above, we have a symbol that is "chick and chick"
There is no operator between them in each pair of chicks, so logically if chick is a symbol of its own, then it is undefined or it is the square root of "chick and chick" Since we're clearly going after the premise that the one chick has been defined, then it's the latter, thus the chick is the square root of 2. So it's 5+1.41421356237...*10
Multiplication first and you have 5+14.1421356237...
The result is 19.1421356237...

42.

[deleted]